Friday, January 17, 2014

Vibration and Bike Setup - Arm Pump Science

We all know that bike setup is important for your speed, comfort and to not wear you down so fast. I'm not here to tell you exactly how to setup the bike but, to educate you on why that setup impacts your physical performance so much.

We all have dealt with the revered arm-pump. This horrible mechanism comes to haunt you in the late stages of a race and can cause your lap times to seriously increase and you lose positions. This mechanism is fairly complex and we have some real challenges in dealing with it. The first thing that I will state is why I don't think it's lactic-acid.

I have heard this before from people and lactic-acid is argued to potentially not even exist in the human body because, it requires a level of acidity the body cant achieve or maintain life at. Regardless we know that Lactate does exist, which helps to shuttle out negative bi-products from exercise and also free Hydrogen ions (H+). These H+ cause your body to be more acidic and can cause that burning sensation you feel. Additionally, the presence of increased H+ concentrations can cause muscles to fatigue faster by inhibiting part of the process that allows them to contract or by competing with part of the complex chemical process of initiating a muscle contraction.

So now.....we all in the motocross world know that your suspension can increase this arm pump and your grip choice for your bars can reduce some of it. The key is why? Vibration!!



Your bike itself when you roll the throttle creates a certain amount of vibration. This vibration then resonates through your body. Additionally, a rough track with bad suspension will put a large volume of high impact stress into your arms from lack of effective absorption from the forks themselves. This in essence acts similar to vibration when the bars are jerking around in your hands, though this would be at a small scale level. This is insanely critical to your performance and this is why.

Bovenzi and Griffin (1997), found that high frequency vibration caused a reduction in blood flow to the fingers, when the hands were tested for blood flow during different vibration frequencies. Additionally Bovenzi et al. (1999), found a reduction in grip strength from the vibration caused by loggers using hand saws. This research shows that high vibration can potentially reduce blood flow to your hands, deprive you of required nutrients to maintain strong muscular contractions and lead to fatigue. This is one potential reason. Some conflicting evidence states a different idea.

According to Nakamura et al. (1995), blood circulation was increased when exposed to whole body vibration and grasping bars. Now additionally what we know in the training world is that high frequency vibration can cause greater amounts of motor neuron activation. In layman's terms; the higher the rate of vibration the greater amount of muscle activation over all and the faster your body learns to do that. This is of course is only true and studied up to somewhere around 80Hz or slightly more.

According to Hazell et al. (2007), higher frequencies of vibration increased muscle EMG activity in general. An average of 3.5% increase in muscle activity was observed across multiple exercises for different parts of the body. This then supports the findings of Nakamura et al. (1995) that blood flow is most likely increased during vibration. Increased blood flow during increased muscle activity seems logical. This though means a shorter time to fatigue from working harder and an increase in H+ that leads to faster fatigue/muscle acidity from more work.

Think of when you were hurt and hadn't been on the bike for a long time. When you first got on and those first few weeks riding, you get arm pump pretty bad until you ride more and it slowly dissipates. The rougher the track the worse it is but, overall it is less the more frequently you ride. It's just like weight training, the more you work the more your body adapts to the stress.

Now this isn't revolutionary science. We've all played a game or been in some situation where you held onto something that was vibrating and it caused your hands to cramp up. I remember playing an Adams Family game at the arcade where you had to hold onto the handles as long as you could while they vibrated at higher and higher frequencies. Eventually it was too intense and you couldn't bear it. Then your hands hurt for a while after. It's the exact same thing just on a larger scale and for greater duration's of time.

In conclusion, I believe that the evidence more clearly supports the idea that the vibration from the bike increases the amount of work the muscles are doing in a very short amount of time, which leads to greater fatigue based on the mechanisms mentioned above. Your arms work harder and create more H+ to increase the muscle acidity. The time to fatigue is already naturally going to be less but, the now secondary effects of increased H+ makes things far worse. The kicker is that your body can only produce so much lactate and transport bi-product out of your body so fast. While the process to get rid of this bad stuff moves along at about the pace of a little Chevy Geo, your muscles are working at about the pace of a Ferrari 458.

Considering all of this and the simplicity of it, you can see why bike setup becomes so critical. You could inadvertently sabotage your own physical performance on the track. The key is to take this simple idea and apply it to your bike setup, to optimize your performance.

References:

Bovenzi M., Zadini A., Franzinelli A., & Borgogni F. (1991). Occupational musculoskeletal disorders in the neck and upper limbs of forestry workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Ergonomics, 34, 547-562.

Bovenzi M., & Griffin M.J., (1997). Haemodynamic changes in ipsilateral and contralateral fingers caused by acute exposures to hand transmitted vibration. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 54, 566-576.

Bovenzi M., Lindsell C.J., & Griffin M.J., (1999). Magnitude of acute exposures to vibration and finger circulation. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health, 25, 278-284.

Hazell, T.J., Jakobi, J.M., & Kenno, K.A. (2007). Effects of whole-body vibration on upper and lower body EMG during static and dynamic contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 32, 1156-1163

Nakamura H., Ariizumi M., Okazawa T., Nagase H., Yoshida M., & Okada A. (1995). Involvement of endothelin in peripheral circulatory induced by hand-arm vibration. Central European Journal of Public Health, 3 (suppl), 27-30.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Phoenix 450 Breakdown and Power Rank Introduced

Phoenix was a bit more of back to normal for racing. There were a few surprises but overall it was closer to what we have come to expect over the past couple of seasons. So lets get to it.

Track Conditions
The track seemed to be pretty good and didn't breakdown as fast as A1. 83% of the fastest laps registered happened in the first half of the race. After lap 10 only 3 racers registered their fastest lap times. This means the track was most likely getting slower as a whole because, you would expect guys to hit their fastest times once the pack got spread out. Which they did but, they did that mostly inside of the first 8 to 10 laps. The only logical conclusion is the track as a whole was breaking down as a whole. This seem to provide some pretty good racing though.

Below is a frequency analysis chart, looking at how frequently people set their fastest lap on what number lap. For example the first column 2 had 3 people set their fastest lap. I do apologize for the lack of organization of title on this chart though, next time will be more descriptive.


Most Consistent:
Looking at all of the lap times the one guy pops out to me, Justin Brayton. The top 10 most consistent racers of the night breakdown as follows:
1. Justin Brayton
2. James Stewart
3. Ryan Villopoto
4. Ryan Dungey
5. Justin Barcia
6. Andrew Short
7. Chad Reed
8. Nick Wey
9. Broc Tickle
10. Ivan Tedesco

Consistency again shows some correlation to where guys finish. Brayton was the most consistent guy overall and had arguably maybe his best performance in Supercross to date. Stewart charged forward, Villopoto won and the rest of the group here doesn't finish off far from where they are ranked in this

Power Ranking
I decided to play around a bit with a power ranking system based off of fastest lap time, variation of lap times and where they finished. Now almost everyone finished 20 laps. The few riders who didn't I simply used the forecasting ability of Excel to predict their potential lap times for lap 19, 20 or both. From there I found their fastest lap times, the variance in their lap times overall and compared this against where they actually finished in the race. This comes together to create what I call a power rank and I will use this overtime to see if we can predict where guys will finish in the next race before it even happens.

Phoenix Power Rankings
1. Villopoto - Finished 1st
2. Brayton - Finished 2nd
3. Dungey - Finished 3rd
4. Stewart - Finished 4th
5. Barcia - Finished 5th
6. Roczen - Finished 6th
7. Short - Finished 7th
8. Tickle - Finished 8th
9. Reed - Finished 9th
10. Moss - Finished 11th

Phoenix Rank Variance + Fast Lap Rank + Average Lap Time
1. Villopoto - Finished 1st
2. Dungey  - Finished 3rd
2. Stewart -Finished 4th
2. Brayton - Finished 2nd
5. Barcia - Finished 5th
6. Roczen - Finished 6th
7. Short - Finished 7th
8. Tickle - Finished 8th
9. Tedesco - Finished 12th
10. Reed - Finished 9th

The results from this were pretty encouraging. This shows that the variance in lap times, your fastest lap and average lap times overall are a strong predictor of where a racer will finish. There was a 3 way tie for 2nd place, but they all somewhere in those 3 positions. So what does this truly mean?

This means that in order to be fast you need to be consistent. You can physically measure progress in your lap times by analyzing these variables and can see how you are doing. Now this doesn't tell you what factors create consistency and reduce variation in your lap times, plus make you fast. But it does let you know what factors to analyze for yourself. Then each individual has different things that make them more or less consistent on the track and influence performance.

Villopoto vs Brayton


This paints an interesting picture about the race. You can definitely see where Brayton's average times were dropping quickly as Villopoto's average lap time was increasing. This resulted in the late battle and charge that we saw. Interesting to see how their race looked visually based on times and in comparison. Brayton seemed to stay consistent to gain the lead and as Villopoto seemed to turn the afterburners on. Then possibly struggle a bit with consistency based on whatever was occurring in the race and Brayton made the late charge to give us some excitement at the end of the race.

Monday, January 6, 2014

A1 450 Breakdown

The times and information that I am using in this article were obtained from the AMA by their website http://archives.amasupercross.com/2014/index.html?EventID=S1405. From there I analyzed the data as a whole. The following is what we are able to tell about the A1 450 main event.

Track Times
From the lap times as a whole we can theorize that the track began to breakdown and the physical stress of racing started to really show itself around lap 7. At this point the lap times as a whole began to drop. Previous to lap 7 or at least at lap 7, approximately 67% of the field turned their fastest lap and 87% by lap 9 (not including those who DNF'd early on). This also seems to be around the time that the race started to get really interesting and the racing got close. The following is a ranking of each lap overall. I did eliminate as many anomalies as I could, that would skew the results.
Lap 1 - not timed
Lap 2 - 14th
Lap 3 - 1st
Lap 4 - 4th
Lap 5 - 3rd
Lap 6 - 2nd
Lap 7 - 13th
Lap 8 - 5th
Lap 9 - 6th
Lap 10 - 8th
Lap 11 - 19th
Lap 12 - 7th
Lap 13 - 9th
Lap 14 - 10th
Lap 15 - 12th
Lap 16 - 11th
Lap 17 - 16th
Lap 18 - 15th
Lap 19 - 17th
Lap 20 - 18th

Speed and Consistency vs Result
This category looks at who was the overall fastest across the duration of the race and who was the most consistent with those lap times. This is important for evaluating performance. You might get a start like Alessi in Heat 1 and be maybe 3 or 4 seconds ahead on lap 2 but loose that slowly across the race, yet still win. If you want to evaluate the performance of a racer not by result alone, then this is how you would do it. I will only list the top 10 though, as the full field is not necessary.
1. Broc Tickle
2. Ken Roczen
3. Ryan Dungey
4. Jake Weimer
5. Andrew Short
6. Justin Barcia
7. Justin Brayton
8. Chad Reed
9. Josh Grant
10. Ryan Villopoto

If we include where the riders officially finished the story is as follows:
1. Ken Roczen
2. Ryan Dungey
3. Broc Tickle
4. Justin Barcia
5. Chad Reed
6. Justin Brayton
7. Jake Weimer
8. Andrew Short
9. Josh Grant
10. Ryan Villopoto

Conclusions:
From this I think we can tell that Ken absolutely deserved to be in first. Now we all have to admit that Stewart would have passed him if he stayed on two wheels. His results were excluded due to his DNF. Roczen though came out and showed everyone in the business that he is going to be for real this year.

Stewart made a real presence and I think the hype around him making a comeback, may be true...this time. I did find that his fastest lap and the overall fastest lap of the race was lap 15. He went down on lap 16 and I think we can surely say that James Stewart is back.

Villopoto was a real shock to everyone. He started strong and went down about the time that the track slowed down overall. The real shocker is after the crash, him not being able to turn it around and surprise us with his ferociousness. At lap 16 he fell off the pace and his lap times were above 1 minute while the leaders were maintaining under 1 minute on average. Whether he decided to play it safe or the crash really took more out of him than we thought, only he will know.

Chad Reed I think proved he is back with some real potential. Why he started to fall off the pace the last couple of lap, who knows. But regardless it was only about about 1 second or less and he showed everyone that he is back in a big way.

Justin Barcia showed that he does have some real potential to be a contender. He rode extremely well and scored high in all of the categories listed. Once he puts everything together as a whole with a bit more experience, he will be consistently challenging for podiums and wins.

Broc Tickle is the real shocker here. He finished 8th overall yet he was the most consistent on his lap times overall  while maintaining highest possible rate of speed for his abilities. I think it's big leap forward for him and the RCH team. Regardless of his final finish I think this shows he has real potential to put the team on the map this year. If he would have started better and been further up front, who knows exactly where he would have finished. Overall though I would say to look out for Tickle this season. It may be his year to make a statement in the 450 class.